No impersonation
The report should never present itself as the person, account owner, brand, or official representative.
- Use third-person language.
- Avoid voice cloning or simulated direct advice.
- State that the profile is educational synthesis.
AI research report boundaries for public people
Public-person research reports need clear boundaries: no impersonation, no official claims, no endorsement, no private intent claims, and no high-risk advice.
No unsupported private claims
Public material can support patterns and inferences, but it cannot prove private motives, private strategy, mental state, or hidden business results.
- Label inference separately from evidence.
- Keep uncertainty visible.
- Use source-limited status when public material is thin.
No high-risk personalized advice
A profile can help frame a question, but it should not provide personalized legal, medical, financial, investment, mental-health, or other high-risk advice.
- Provide general educational framing.
- Tell users to verify context.
- Direct high-risk decisions to qualified professionals.
FAQ
Common questions
Is MindShelf official or endorsed by the people it analyzes?
No. Public samples and generated reports are not official, not endorsed, and not affiliated unless explicitly stated otherwise by a verified source.
What happens if sources are weak?
The right behavior is to mark the report as source-limited or needing review instead of pretending the profile is definitive.